|
|
buster42
|
June 30, 2009, 1:25 pm |
|
Administrator
Joined: March 31, 2009, 2:57 pm
Posts: 1140
Location: North Carolina
|
 Trine Just played the demo of this on Steam. Pretty fun. The characters all feel unique and the puzzles are pretty cool (and very physics based). I might pick up the full version of it.
_________________
.
|
|
LittlestCthulhu
|
June 30, 2009, 2:28 pm |
|
Administrator
Joined: March 22, 2009, 3:59 pm
Posts: 2123
Location: GameTap HQ
|
Re: Trine buster42 wrote: Just played the demo of this on Steam. Pretty fun. The characters all feel unique and the puzzles are pretty cool (and very physics based). I might pick up the full version of it. | | |
Me to, I'm definitely picking it up, probably from PSN though. It's cheaper and the game felt better suited to console gaming.
_________________
^(;,;)^ ~ Never bring a knife to a hammer fight.  
|
|
buster42
|
June 30, 2009, 2:51 pm |
|
Administrator
Joined: March 31, 2009, 2:57 pm
Posts: 1140
Location: North Carolina
|
Re: Trine I thought it seemed better for mouse with the way the controls worked. PSN being cheaper is a nice incentive, though.
_________________
.
|
|
jac1002
|
June 30, 2009, 4:31 pm |
|
Joined: July 13, 2007, 2:59 pm
Posts: 1844
Location: Sector: 2261
|
Re: Trine i just got done with the demo and i will definitely be downloading at some point.
the wizard,warrior,thief set of characters reminds me of gauntlet.(which we need to have on gametap.)
_________________
May your aim be true and your hits Critical!
|
|
Goldenspiral
|
July 1, 2009, 11:56 am |
|
Joined: February 13, 2008, 9:30 am
Posts: 215
|
Re: Trine jac1002 wrote: i just got done with the demo and i will definitely be downloading at some point.
the wizard,warrior,thief set of characters reminds me of gauntlet.(which we need to have on gametap.) | | |
Gauntlet would have been removed by now with the problems with the Midway licensing. Anyhow, Gauntlet isn't nearly as fun without multiplayer support and GT won't have that feature for a long while, if it ever does return.
|
|
gamerstuff
|
July 5, 2009, 5:20 am |
|
Joined: June 18, 2009, 2:49 am
Posts: 44
|
Re: Trine I really hope they add in a (online)multiplayer patch for co-op later on. Local multiplayer isn't always an option for me. Game looks amazing though but i haven't found time to demo it yet 
|
|
samuraiwarrior41
|
April 2, 2010, 11:05 pm |
|
Joined: March 31, 2009, 11:13 pm
Posts: 1148
|
Re: Trine Goldenspiral wrote: jac1002 wrote: i just got done with the demo and i will definitely be downloading at some point.
the wizard,warrior,thief set of characters reminds me of gauntlet.(which we need to have on gametap.) | | |
Gauntlet would have been removed by now with the problems with the Midway licensing. Anyhow, Gauntlet isn't nearly as fun without multiplayer support and GT won't have that feature for a long while, if it ever does return. | | |
well when the challenge lobby was on the original gametap no one played gauntlet well i think one or two people played with me but after a while they say oh i gotta go or something like that.
_________________
now playing Rad Retro reviews by the AlphaNerd and remember, RETRO RULES! (slaps left arm)
|
|
buster42
|
April 2, 2010, 11:32 pm |
|
Administrator
Joined: March 31, 2009, 2:57 pm
Posts: 1140
Location: North Carolina
|
Re: Trine samuraiwarrior41 wrote: Goldenspiral wrote: jac1002 wrote: i just got done with the demo and i will definitely be downloading at some point.
the wizard,warrior,thief set of characters reminds me of gauntlet.(which we need to have on gametap.) | | |
Gauntlet would have been removed by now with the problems with the Midway licensing. Anyhow, Gauntlet isn't nearly as fun without multiplayer support and GT won't have that feature for a long while, if it ever does return. | | |
well when the challenge lobby was on the original gametap no one played gauntlet well i think one or two people played with me but after a while they say oh i gotta go or something like that. | | |
Gauntlet was never on Gametap, and that was a really irrelevant reason to bump this thread.
_________________
.
|
|
| |
